Back
The Sentiment Analysis Trap: Why Your Coverage Report Keeps Getting It Wrong
AICoreSpot Webinar Report

The Stubborn Reality of Green, Red, and Neutral
Steve Bauer, Senior Vice President at FleishmanHillard (now Principal at Bauer Consulting Group), delivered an uncommonly candid assessment. "I still have yet to see anyone crack that code and get it absolutely accurate," he said, describing the familiar pattern PR professionals see in sentiment reports.
"Those visuals that we would get of sentiment analysis, there's always a little bit of green on one side, a little bit of red on the other and the vast majority is neutral in the middle," Bauer explained. "That's because machines are getting smarter but they don't yet have the full capacity to understand context, to understand sarcasm, to understand so many of the other variables that go into sentiment analysis."
This limitation persists despite decades of research and billions in investment. Sentiment analysis has been a focal point of natural language processing development, yet achieving reliability remains elusive.

What Machines Miss
The problem isn't just technical. Bauer identified fundamental gaps in machine comprehension, noting that understanding "who's driving the conversation, who within the audience is helping to shape positive or negative perceptions" requires "creativity," "curiosity," and "human intervention not just technology."